Talk:Corona-chan

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Eirikr in topic RFV discussion: August 2022
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: August 2022

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Name of a cartoon character, or some character? We ain't an anime catalogue. Equinox 08:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shot on sight, along with Japanese entry コロナちゃん. Deleted as "created in error". Literally anything can be personified by adding the personal suffixes さん (-san), ちゃん (-chan), etc.
I demur to be so quick to shoot down English Miss Rona and Vietnamese Cô Vy. I ask other editors to have a look and judge whether these are includable.
The creating user for all of these the Japanese entries was Hàlian (talkcontribs). @Hàlian, please note that any entry must meet the criteria at WT:CFI. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 19:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
That seems more like an issue for RFD though. AG202 (talk) 20:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Not created in error; term is notable enough for inclusion in the Japanese Wikipedia. I simply hadn't gotten around to adding more references and attestations. :/ Hàlian (talk) 21:35, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Equinox, AG202, Hàlian: By "created in error", I did not mean to contest that this string exists in the wild -- rather, 1) the name is trivially understandable from its component pieces コロナ (korona) and ちゃん (-chan), and thus this is SOP (as I mentioned above about personification); and 2) this is a fictional character, and thus more appropriate to an encyclopedia (as Equinox pointed out) -- see Wiktionary:Criteria_for_inclusion#Wiktionary_is_not_an_encyclopedia. References and citations can only help if they can show that this has some idiomatic meaning other than the SOP sense of "personification of the coronavirus". I can restore the page and add to WT:RFD/CJK if so desired. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I'd prefer that personally. AG202 (talk) 03:09, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Also, @Hàlian, the notability that you mention is a criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia, but not here. Wiktionary has its own criteria for inclusion, which do not include notability. Please see Wiktionary is not Wikipedia for a fuller explanation, particularly the "Differences in content" subsection. ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 22:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply