Talk:Japono
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Rfv-sense "Japanese person" This is clearly used with this meaning online, but I'm not sure it can be cited. Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 09:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- "clearly used ... online" - then how about usenet or google groups (groups.google.com/forum/#!overview)? It's online too but treated as durably archived. -84.161.10.69 11:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, there's generally not a lot of Ido on Usenet, but there are in fact three attestations. [1] [2] [3]
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 12:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)- On closer inspection, it looks like all those quotations go back to the same person and the time span is just under a year.
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 12:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- On closer inspection, it looks like all those quotations go back to the same person and the time span is just under a year.
- Thanks, there's generally not a lot of Ido on Usenet, but there are in fact three attestations. [1] [2] [3]
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Ido: “Apocopic form of Japoniano”. Tagged by Lingo Bingo Dingo on 18 September 2017 (Talk:Japono: “On closer inspection, it looks like all those quotations go back to the same person and the time span is just under a year.”) 07:33, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just a note that this RFV has already been resolved. Might want to strike out the title. Razorflame 19:08, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Razorflame: As there are no cites and the sense has not been removed it is not resolved. J3133 (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a thing. Ido apocopics are a closed class reserved mostly for pronouns and particles. Audrey (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- RFV-failed. Ultimateria (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2022 (UTC)