Talk:appeasatory
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Noun: something intended to appease. Nothing on the Web for "appeasatories" plural, and I can't find a noun via "an appeasatory" either. Equinox ◑ 01:20, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- I can find one supporting cite (two more to go) :
- 1810, Stephen Cullen Carpenter, The Mirror of Taste and Dramatic Censor - Volume 1, page 460:
- Every child has heard the ingenious distich, or rather tristich, time out of mind, the nurse's appeasatory for squalling children:
- Kiwima (talk) 17:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, that is unambiguously a noun. Nothing else on Google Books for "appeasatory for", however... Equinox ◑ 09:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
- I found one use of the plural on Usenet:
- https://groups.google.com/forum/#!search/appeasatories/clothescrimefighters/ThbIoPJ17v8/P1K3EI2aBAAJ
- "One of my appeasatories is melatonin, since it helps me to be quiet and calm down and stuff. It's very relaxing." Khemehekis (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Note the group - this is the same author who "created" support for crimefighters as underwear. Nice try, but it doesn't work. Kiwima (talk) 20:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
- Could you give me some background on this sentence? I just have to hear about it. Khemehekis (talk) 01:13, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
See Talk:crime fighters. Kiwima (talk) 03:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, my. Khemehekis (talk) 04:23, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- I've looked at all the Usenet hits, all the Google Books hits, and all the Google hits for "appeasatory", and I've found only a single legitimate use of the noun. Is it finally time to close this discussion? Khemehekis (talk) 07:39, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, it is undoubtedly past time. I have been procrastinating on this one because I am convinced that this is a word, albeit a rare one. RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 03:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)