Talk:does one

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Msh210 in topic does one
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This should probably be cleaned up and co-ordinated with the explanation of the auxiliary verb at do.

See Wiktionary:Requests for deletion for details. Eclecticology 08:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


The comment, even in May of 08, was: "Was RFCed a while ago, never cleaned. Formatting is crap." — Beobach 00:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good now?​—msh210 (talk) 22:08, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes! Thank you! :) — Beobach 23:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply


The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


does one

[edit]

SOP: does + one. Replace with {{only in|{{in appendix|English tag questions}}}}.​—msh210 (talk) 22:10, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Note that we can collect and keep translations of tag questions (and presumably any other pertinent information) at innit and, if we add the sense(!), at right. — Beobach 22:36, 7 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Remove all skeletons from my closet. DAVilla 08:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I like the appendix idea, not only for simplicity and neatness, but also because I think it's the most user-friendly solution. Mglovesfun (talk) 15:47, 8 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for not being clear. Sure, I wasn't opposed to that idea. DAVilla 17:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Appendicized.​—msh210 (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)Reply