Talk:hystricomorph

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Denazz in topic RFV discussion: June–December 2023
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: June–December 2023

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Rfv-sense

  1. Any Old World porcupine of the family Hystricidae

This was the original definition, added in 2008 by WF- who knows about as much about taxonomy as he does about nuclear physics and quantum mechanics. It's true that the sum of its Ancient Greek parts adds up to "in the form of a porcupine", but he got the taxonomic rank all wrong. The term really refers to one of the major subdivisions of the world's rodents (it has to do with jaw muscles being of the type that porcupines have), which includes things like naked mole rats, chinchillas, guinea pigs, capybaras, cane rats, gundis, and even New World porcupines. While porcupines are [a very small] part of the hystricomorphs, pretty much all of the Google Books hits I've seen refer to things that are definitely not Old World porcupines as hystricomorphs.

I was tempted to just change it, but the definition has been there for almost a decade and a half and it's theoretically possible that someone, somewhere has used it in this sense sometime in the past few centuries. The hard part is going to be figuring out which sense is meant in passages that mention only porcupines, since this sense is, by definition, a subset of the wider one- all Old World porcupines are hystricomorphs in both senses. Pinging @Vox Sciurorum, who may be able to help- though I'm sure they have better things to do. Chuck Entz (talk) 02:09, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply