Talk:miranym

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: September 2020–April 2021
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Usage

[edit]
moved out of the entry

Apparently a modern literary word with little popular usage. Mentioned in the book Word Nerd: More Than 17,000 Fascinating Facts about Words[1] by lexicographer and linguist Barbara Ann Kipfer and in A. J. Jacobs' book The Know-It-All,[2] it is also regarded by some to be a literary device living in digital obscurity;[please clarify][3] [4]for example, Miranda, B notes, in Miranyms and Moses Illusions, My, Oh, Myǃ[5], that this word is not often seen beyond niche pockets of study sites, such as Quizlet (link to example), and Huffman also references miranyms as a literary term of, "English in the Digital Age"[6].

The word is highlighted by Richard Nordquist, professor emeritus of Rhetoric and English at Georgia Southern University and freelance writer, as a "weird, witty, and wonderful language-related term"[7] and Lois Huffman, a consultant for the Centre for Applied Linguistics at North Carolina State University, believes that miranyms are a useful and important device in helping students further understand and engage with certain literary concepts, such as synonyms, antonyms, and homonyms[8]

  1. ^ Kipfer, B. (2007). Word Nerd: More Than 17,000 Fascinating Facts About Words. Naperville, Ill.: Sourcebooks, p.342.
  2. ^ Jacobs, A. (2006). The Know-It-All: One Man's Humble Quest To Become The Smartest Person In The World. London: Arrow Books, pp.178-179.
  3. ^ Miranda, B. (2020). Miranyms And Moses Illusions, My, Oh, My!. Writers Access. [online]. Available at: <https://www.writeraccess.com/blog/miranyms-and-moses-illusions-my-oh-my/> [Accessed 6 September 2020].
  4. ^ Huffman, L. (2015). Viva Vocabulary! Practical Ways to Promote Word Consciousness: just following up, lots of additions. NC Readings. [online]. (Part 1 of 3), pp.1-12. Available at: <https://ncreadingcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/additions-part-i.pdf> [Accessed 6 September 2020].
  5. ^ Miranda, B. (2020). Miranyms And Moses Illusions, My, Oh, My!. Writers Access. [online]. Available at: <https://www.writeraccess.com/blog/miranyms-and-moses-illusions-my-oh-my/> [Accessed 6 September 2020].
  6. ^ Huffman, L. (2015). Viva Vocabulary! Practical Ways to Promote Word Consciousness: just following up, lots of additions. NC Readings. [online]. (Part 1 of 3), pp.1. Available at: <https://ncreadingcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/additions-part-i.pdf> [Accessed 6 September 2020].
  7. ^ Nordquist, R., 2019. 25 Weird, Witty, And Wonderful Language-Related Terms. [online] ThoughtCo. Available at: <https://www.thoughtco.com/witty-and-wonderful-language-related-terms-1692380> [Accessed 6 September 2020].
  8. ^ Huffman, L. (2015). Viva Vocabulary! Practical Ways to Promote Word Consciousness: just following up, lots of additions. NC Readings. [online]. (Part 1 of 3), pp.1, 5, 9. Available at: <https://ncreadingcom.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/additions-part-i.pdf> [Accessed 6 September 2020].

RFV discussion: September 2020–April 2021

[edit]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


Interesting word, but one independent use shy of passing the RFV as far as I can find. — Ungoliant (falai) 23:48, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I added the two books mentioned in the entry to the citations page, but one seems like a mention (it's a glossary-like list of words and their definitions). The other one contains a mention followed by what arguably is one use. The string also occurs as someone's twitter(?) handle in this magazine, which isn't really a citation; it's not in any other magazines nor in academic journals AFAICT. (It's also a multiple-choice option in this seemingly not durably exam.) - -sche (discuss) 07:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFV-failed (Sadly, I LIKED the word, but there just is not the evidence of use.) Kiwima (talk) 23:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)Reply