Talk:oh yes
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Liliana-60 in topic oh yes
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Sum of parts? ---> Tooironic 14:48, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Oh yes. --Hekaheka 16:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- This usage means "indubitably", so keep. Rich Farmbrough, 21:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC).
- That's not a sense that is present in the entry so it isn't the one being disputed here. Equinox ◑ 21:45, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- This usage means "indubitably", so keep. Rich Farmbrough, 21:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC).
- The creator made a lot of dubious entries relating to slang used at his school. I can see what he's getting at here — it is that sort of jubilant "oh yes!" of a tricky pool shot being pulled off, as opposed to (say) a thoughtful acknowledgement "ah yes" — but it does sound a bit SoPpy. Equinox ◑ 16:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- To me, irritating as I find it, it does seem to function as a single unit, as does oh no. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Same sentiment here. DAVilla 16:34, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- To me, irritating as I find it, it does seem to function as a single unit, as does oh no. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:34, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Ƿidsiþ 08:34, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
- Delete immediately. --Actarus (Prince d'Euphor) 09:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
deleted -- Liliana • 01:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)