Talk:swack

Category problem

This page is badly categorized. --Æ&Œ (talk) 22:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

@Æ&Œ could you be more specific? Except for Category:dsb:Family and Category:dsb:Male, both of which seem appropriate to me, all of the categories are added automatically by templates, all of which also seem appropriate to me. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 09:22, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

The word is treated like it’s Scots, but it’s obviously English. --Æ&Œ (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Better now? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 23:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

You marked this page for deletion stating "problem solved", but it's not customary to delete talk pages for that reason. We'll just mark this  Done. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Umm…okay? --Æ&Œ (talk) 01:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

RFV discussion: November 2020–January 2021

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

swack

Tagged by 2003:DE:371B:BD44:C1CF:54B1:61B7:FDC3 today, not listed. J3133 (talk) 14:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

I added a number of missing meanings, but could not find evidence for the challenged sense. I also added some miscellaneous quotes to the citations page for senses that seemed on their own, and for which I could not clearly deduce the intended meaning. Kiwima (talk) 03:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

RFV-failed Kiwima (talk) 06:10, 7 January 2021 (UTC)