Talk:vidunderleg
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Barend in topic RFV discussion: January–August 2016
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
I believe it should be spelt vedunderleg. I have just sent a message to User:Njardarlogar about this and am awaiting a reply. Donnanz (talk) 12:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- That's the only correct spelling according to the dictionary, but it appears to have less Google hits than vidunderleg (1, 2), so it's probably worth a
{{misspelling of}}entry. --Njardarlogar (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)- Re Google hits, I was beginning to suspect that. Anyway, treating it as a misspelling is probably the best solution. Donnanz (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- I have included it as usage notes, added a couple of references, and removed the RFV. Job done, I hope. Donnanz (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- Don't be deceived by the inaccurate Google hit counts. If you actually click through the result pages, you will notice that "vidunderleg" has 30 pages of results (299 total results), while "vedunderleg" has 34 pages of results (331 total results). --WikiTiki89 19:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
- It appears that this is resolved. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- But - since this is patently a misspelling, shouldn't this page only be Misspelling of vedunderleg.?--Barend (talk) 14:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)