Talk:xerox copy

RFD discussion: April 2014

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

xerox copy

This seems entirely redundant to xerox. Equinox ◑ 14:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Keep per WT:COALMINE. — Ungoliant ^(falai) 17:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Because of "xeroxcopy"? Wow, maybe someone has spelled it that way. Equinox ◑ 17:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

They have. — Ungoliant ^(falai) 17:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

• Hmm, keep it. An extended form of xerox. I don't think we use this term in the UK. Donnanz (talk) 23:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Delete —Michael Z. 2014-04-10 00:33 z

Definitely Keep. --Anatoli ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 00:55, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Kept per WT:CM. xeroxcopy should probably be cited. DAVilla 20:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

I agree that this should be kept, because I know it is commonly used in some countries. Somerandomuser (talk) 00:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)