Template talk:Xpeo2img

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: January–August 2018[edit]

Keep tidy.svg

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

Used on four Old Persian entries out of 159. Is it still needed? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)





As above: unused, and obsolete? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested speedy delete for the last four. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 19:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Clarification: this is part of {{t2i}}. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 18:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
@Mahagaja: What do you think of this (especially of Template:Ogam2img)? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 13:34, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
I don't think of it at all. I've never understood Glagolitic. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 13:45, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
@Mahagaja: I was talking about {{Ogam2img}}. It's not used in any Old Irish entry. --Per utramque cavernam 10:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
@Per utramque cavernam: It would be used in Primitive Irish (pgl) entries if it were being used at all, but since it isn't, it can be deleted. It doesn't even seem to work correctly as far as I can tell. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 19:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Two more to go; @Vorziblix, what do you think of these Glagolitic templates? --Per utramque cavernam 10:46, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
@Per utramque cavernam: Sorry for the late response; I’ve been away for a while. I don’t see a need for the Glagolitic templates myself — the script has been adequately encoded in Unicode for a long time, which is what we use for our entries in any case. The square Glagolitic is better considered a different style/font than a different script, and it wouldn’t make much sense to encode it differently from round Glagolitic. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 15:02, 2 June 2018 (UTC)