Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2007-11/User:Tbot for bot status

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Tbot for bot status[edit]

  • Vote ends: 12 November 2007 23:59 UTC
  • Vote started: 08:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Support[edit]

  1. SupportRuakhTALK 15:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Connel MacKenzie 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC) --Connel MacKenzie 20:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Robert Ullmann 23:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support \Mike 18:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support — [ ric | opiaterein ] — 16:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC) yay[reply]
  6. Support Conrad.Irwin 23:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support DAVilla 03:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Yea![reply]
  8. Support. bd2412 T 00:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support EncycloPetey 02:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC) For the record, I think it's a bad idea for a bot to create translational entries, even though this is not part of the present vote.[reply]
    It would be a bad idea for a bot to create entries that went unchecked; if they just appeared as "normal" entries some of the oddities might persist for a long time. (Some are quite amusing: Noun אסלה (aslá) f. 1. throne (lavatory or toilet) ... ;-). Creating entries that someone can then look at and expand is useful. It may depend largely on who is working on the language. Robert Ullmann 04:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Rod (A. Smith) 01:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Jyril 09:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Cynewulf 18:20, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Even though it's already past the deadline.[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Abstain[edit]

  1. AbstainSaltmarshTalk 15:14, 6 November 2007 (UTC) I would be inclined to vote for this but since all implications of the vote might be over my head I will just abstain.[reply]

Decision[edit]