Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek for checkuser

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Versageek for checkuser[edit]

  • Vote ends: 19 September 2007 23:59 UTC
  • Vote started: 19 August 2007
  • Acceptance:
I accept this nomination, thanks. --Versageek 12:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, Should I be chosen as a local CheckUser, I agree to abide by the WMF CheckUser policy as recorded on Meta. --Versageek 13:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support[edit]

  1. Support. Note that Versageek is a CheckUser on WikiHow, so is already familiar with these complex tools. DAVilla 12:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support —Stephen 13:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Rod (A. Smith) 19:15, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support EncycloPetey 19:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support. bd2412 T 02:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support —Saltmarsh 06:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Connel MacKenzie 06:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support Jeffqyzt 13:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support We need more checkusers, from what I've seen, and I'm sure Versageek would be a good person to have and use the tools. Neskaya talk 21:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support SemperBlotto 21:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. 'Support 'ArielGlenn 21:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Tohru 12:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support I'm wary of creating any new CheckUsers at all, but I'll support one as I think that at least, might have utility. None of the other candidates are untrustworthy, but I think Versageek is ideal, and has experience to boot. Dmcdevit·t 07:06, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support H. (talk) 15:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Williamsayers79 10:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support --Cometstyles 21:57, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Keene 11:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

  2. Oppose Aphaia 04:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC) Not personal but reviewing the log, English Wiktionary doesn't seem to need another checkuser. At least now. 50 checks were performed since August 1, 2007. I think three users enough to deal with them. And generally I think the number of checkuser granted users should be kept only as many as necessary.[reply]

Abstain[edit]

Decision[edit]

Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2007-08/User:Versageek_for_checkuser&oldid=75279092"