Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search

User:Angr for admin[edit]

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate Angr (talkcontribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He has been a contributor here for years, with high volumes of contributions to entries, to templates, and to discussions. Our coverage of, and infrastructure for, several languages would be much the poorer without him, and in discussions his comments are always relevant, level-headed, and to-the-point. —RuakhTALK 15:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Acceptance:
    • Languages: en, de, fr, ga
    • Timezone: UTC+01 (UTC+02 during the EU's Summer Time)
    I accept the nomination with thanks. —Angr 15:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Support[edit]

  1. Symbol support vote.svg Support SemperBlotto 15:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  2. Symbol support vote.svg Support.​—msh210 (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  3. Symbol support vote.svg Support Mglovesfun (talk) 16:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  4. Symbol support vote.svg Support. Don't be ridiculous, Angr has been an admin for years. bd2412 T 16:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
    I know, right? —RuakhTALK 17:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  5. Symbol support vote.svg SupportRuakhTALK 17:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  6. Symbol support vote.svg Support he wasn't? -- Liliana 17:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  7. Symbol support vote.svg Support Dan Polansky 19:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  8. Symbol support vote.svg Support Equinox 19:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC) I didn't spot any vandal-fighting in the past month of his/her contributions, but there are good edits going back to 2005! Equinox 19:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
    I don't think vandal-fighting is a very important criterion in evaluating a prospective admin, especially since it's harder for a non-admin to engage in it (what with not being able to see which edits need patrolling). Rather, what matters is that the user be trustworthy, and represent the project well. Such a user, given the admin tools, will make good use of them, even if (s)he never once visits http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges?hidepatrolled=1 nor http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special:NewPages?hidepatrolled=1. (Of course, it would be nice if admins visited those pages more often, but they're not the main reason to adminify someone.) —RuakhTALK 20:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
    It's true I don't go vandal-hunting either here or at the projects where I'm already an admin (Wikipedia, Wiksource, Commons), but I do revert vandalism when I spot it. —Angr 21:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  9. Symbol support vote.svg Support Ƿidsiþ 19:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  10. Symbol support vote.svg SupportInternoob 22:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  11. Symbol support vote.svg Support The more the merrier. JamesjiaoTC 02:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  12. Symbol support vote.svg Support TheDaveRoss 02:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  13. Symbol support vote.svg Support --Anatoli 23:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  14. Symbol support vote.svg Support Maro 19:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  15. Symbol support vote.svg Support - -sche (discuss) 01:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  16. Symbol support vote.svg Support —Stephen (Talk) 11:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  17. Symbol support vote.svg Support EncycloPetey 03:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
  18. Symbol support vote.svg Support. DAVilla 07:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Oppose[edit]

Abstain[edit]

Decision[edit]

  • passes --Rockpilot 23:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
    • Thanks to everyone who voted for putting their trust in me! —Angr 10:01, 19 October 2011 (UTC)