Newton's flaming laser sword
Named after Isaac Newton. Coined by Australian mathematician Mike Alder in a 2004 article of the same title, to be hyperbolically "much sharper and more dangerous than Occam's Razor".
- A philosophical razor which states that what cannot be settled by experiment is not worth debating.
2004, Alder, Mike, “Newton's Flaming Laser Sword, Or: Why Mathematicians and Scientists don't like Philosophy but do it anyway”, in (Please provide the book title or journal name):
- Mathematicians and scientists feel that they have found a more difficult but much more satisfying game to play. Newton's Flaming Laser Sword is one of the rules of that game.
2010 October 25, "Valhallen", “Re: The meaning of the universe explained by Jesus”, in Snafu Comics, retrieved 2011-12-05:
- Also, I invoke Newton's Flaming Laser Sword on this thread.
2011 January 8, "Azwraith", “Atheism - Belief? Religion? (comment)”, in Minegarde, retrieved 2011-12-05:
- What is the actual point of adding in God to your equation if it is a unknown domain? So, we remove such variables using the Newton's Flaming Laser Sword.
2011 July 19, "Drastic", “Thought Experiment Regarding Morality (comment)”, in That Guy With the Glasses, retrieved 2011-12-05:
- Just demanding there is nothing you can do, because the flashy light told you so is grounds for Newton's Flaming Laser Sword.
2011 September 12, "Decivre", “Open thread on Episode #726 (comment)”, in The Atheist Experience, retrieved 2011-12-05:
- Put as much math as you want to it, and it's still a philosophical statement... to which I say that Newton's Flaming Laser Sword is the best response: "what cannot be settled by experiment is not worth debating".