Jump to content

Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-éh₂

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

[edit]

Etymology

[edit]

    From *-h₂.

    Suffix

    [edit]

    *-éh₂ n

    1. Creates collective nouns and mass nouns, corresponding to thematic formations with accent on the suffix.

    Usage notes

    [edit]

    This collective noun suffix gave rise to the thematic neuter plural suffix in nuclear (i.e. non-Anatolian) Indo-European languages. In Anatolian itself, it is disputed whether nouns attested with this suffix are plural or collective in number.

    Derived terms

    [edit]
    • *-i-eh₂
      • Balto-Slavic:
        • Proto-Slavic: *-ьja

    Suffix

    [edit]

      *(o)-éh₂ f[1]

      1. Creates action nouns and abstract nouns.
        *bʰer- (to bear) + ‎*-éh₂ → ‎*bʰoréh₂ (carrying, burden)

      Usage notes

      [edit]

      These o-grade feminine abstract nouns are known as τομή (tomḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature.[2]

      Inflection

      [edit]
      Thematic in *-eh₂
      singular
      nominative *(o)-éh₂
      genitive *(o)-éh₂s
      singular dual plural
      nominative *(o)-éh₂ *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂es
      vocative *(o)-éh₂ *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂es
      accusative *(o)-ā́m *(o)-éh₂h₁(e) *(o)-éh₂m̥s
      genitive *(o)-éh₂s *? *(o)-éh₂oHom
      ablative *(o)-éh₂s *? *(o)-éh₂mos, *(o)-éh₂bʰos
      dative *(o)-éh₂ey *? *(o)-éh₂mos, *(o)-éh₂bʰos
      locative *(o)-éh₂, *(o)-éh₂i *? *(o)-éh₂su
      instrumental *(o)-éh₂h₁ *? *(o)-éh₂mis, *(o)-éh₂bʰis

      Derived terms

      [edit]
      [edit]

      Descendants

      [edit]

      Suffix

      [edit]

        *(∅)-éh₂ f[1]

        1. Creates action nouns and abstract nouns.
          *bʰewg- (to flee) + ‎*-éh₂ → ‎*bʰugéh₂ (flight)

        Usage notes

        [edit]

        These nouns are known as φυγή (phugḗ)-type nouns in Indo-Europeanist literature. They are mainly formed from verbal roots, generally of the shape *CeRT-.

        Inflection

        [edit]
        Thematic in *-eh₂
        singular
        nominative *(∅)-éh₂
        genitive *(∅)-éh₂s
        singular dual plural
        nominative *(∅)-éh₂ *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂es
        vocative *(∅)-éh₂ *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂es
        accusative *(∅)-ā́m *(∅)-éh₂h₁(e) *(∅)-éh₂m̥s
        genitive *(∅)-éh₂s *? *(∅)-éh₂oHom
        ablative *(∅)-éh₂s *? *(∅)-éh₂mos, *(∅)-éh₂bʰos
        dative *(∅)-éh₂ey *? *(∅)-éh₂mos, *(∅)-éh₂bʰos
        locative *(∅)-éh₂, *(∅)-éh₂i *? *(∅)-éh₂su
        instrumental *(∅)-éh₂h₁ *? *(∅)-éh₂mis, *(∅)-éh₂bʰis

        Derived terms

        [edit]

        References

        [edit]
        1. 1.0 1.1 Lundquist, Jesse; Yates, Anthony D. (2018), “Chapter XX: Proto-Indo-European”, in Klein, Jared S., Joseph, Brian D., Fritz, Matthias, editors, Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics: An International Handbook (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science]; 41.2), volume 3, Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, →ISBN, § The morphology of Proto-Indo-European, page 2109
        2. ^ Weiss, Michael L. (2009), Outline of the Historical and Comparative Grammar of Latin, Ann Arbor: Beech Stave Press, →ISBN, page 300