Talk:劍橋春天
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Justinrleung in topic RFV discussion: December 2019–February 2021
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Name of a housing estate. — This unsigned comment was added by Sameer (talk • contribs).
- @Sameer, Suzukaze-c The total population of this residential community is probably several thousand, much bigger than Loving County.
- Sources:
- "【2013年代码及城乡分类】420111002: {...} ～041 111剑桥春天居委会" [1]
- "420111002041 111 剑桥春天居委会" [2]
- "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low." (WP:GEOLAND) You want me to create entries based on usefulness, but I am creating entries based on notability. If this doesn't satisfy wiktionary's policies of criteria for inclusion, then I will quit making these articles. In my ideal, all the village-level divisions, including 社区, would appear on wikipedia, wiktionary etc. The name of 中南财经政法大学南湖社区 doesn't look as pretty as the two-character names of many other 社区, but I found it in two sources, and it seems reasonable enough. No question that it administers thousands of people. To avoid including 中南财经政法大学南湖社区 is to say that Loving, where there are less than 100 people, is more important than this 社区, where there are thousands of people. The way I see it, all minor geography is minor and could be considered less useful than other work. But in fact, I'm setting down a foundation for a wiki world in which Chinese minor geography is more 完善. I have added some cities too. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 22:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
--Geographyinitiative (talk) 04:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- The location is a residential community, which is a village-level division (5th level of divisions) of the PRC. As such, it is included in "Category:zh:Residential communities". --Geographyinitiative (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC) (modified)
- Keep if attestable per WT:ATTEST, so this should probably be sent to RFV. The sources above aren't that useful because they're just in a list. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 17:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- RFD kept, but sent to RFV. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 18:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Brought over from RFD. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 18:51, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- One possible use (with 社區) [3]. Not sure if durably archived. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 22:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Cited. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 16:12, 19 February 2021 (UTC)