Talk:-이다

@Wyang, TAKASUGI Shinji Hi. Would it be too much work to add a full conjugation for 이다 (ida) and 아니다 (anida)? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 03:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

How many forms do we provide for a Korean verb? 이다 (ida) is irregular in present indicative of informal register (이야 (iya) and 이에요 (ieyo)). — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 04:11, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

It's a little different in the way that there are forms with or without 이 - both 이야 and 야, 이에요 and 예요. Otherwise, it's probably similar to other verbs but should there be imperatives? --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 06:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm not 100% sure what the correct forms are... If I can have all the differences in the table for 이다 (from the one regularly produced), I could amend the module to include ida. Wyang (talk) 07:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

@Wyang, TAKASUGI Shinji OK. I'll get the forms what I can find but I'm not sure about all the forms myself. We'll see what gaps we have. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 08:31, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I have separated 이다 and 다 on French Wiktionary, which is an easy way to display two forms. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Test

    Selected forms of the adjective 이다 (ida): vowel-stem, 이(i)-irregular

Sentence-final forms
		Formal non-polite (해라체)	Informal non-polite (해체)	Informal polite (해요체)	Formal polite (하십시오체)
Indicative	Non-past	이다 ida	이야 iya	이에요, 예요 ieyo, yeyo	입니다 imnida
	Past	이었다, 였다 ieotda, yeotda	이었어, 였어 ieosseo, yeosseo	이었어요, 였어요 ieosseoyo, yeosseoyo	이었습니다, 였습니다 ieotseumnida, yeotseumnida
Interrogative	Non-past	이냐 inya	이야 iya	이에요, 예요 ieyo, yeyo	입니까 imnikka
	Past	이었느냐, 였느냐 ieonneunya, yeonneunya	이었어, 였어 ieosseo, yeosseo	이었어요, 였어요 ieosseoyo, yeosseoyo	이었습니까, 였습니까 ieotseumnikka, yeotseumnikka
Assertive		이겠다 igetda	이겠어 igesseo	이겠어요 igesseoyo	이겠습니다 igetseumnida
Connective forms
Cause/Reason		이에 ie	이어서 ieoseo	이니 ini	이니까 inikka
Contrast		이지만 ijiman	인데 inde	이더니 ideoni
Conjunction		이고 igo
Condition		이면 imyeon	이어야 ieoya
Noun and determiner forms
Verbal nouns		임 im	이기 igi
Past-tense verbal nouns		이었음, 였음 ieosseum, yeosseum	이었기, 였기 ieotgi, yeotgi
Determiners	Present		인 in
	Future		일 il

Sentence-final forms with honorific
		Plain (해라체)	Informal (해체)	Polite (해요체)	Formal (하십시오체)
Indicative	Non-past	이시다 isida	이셔 isyeo	이세요, 이셔요 iseyo, isyeoyo	이십니다 isimnida
	Past	이셨다 isyeotda	이셨어 isyeosseo	이셨어요 isyeosseoyo	이셨습니다 isyeotseumnida
Interrogative	Non-past	이시냐 isinya	이셔 isyeo	이세요, 이셔요 iseyo, isyeoyo	이십니까 isimnikka
	Past	이셨냐 isyeonnya	이셨어 isyeosseo	이셨어요 isyeosseoyo	이셨습니까 isyeotseumnikka
Assertive		이시겠다 isigetda	이시겠어 isigesseo	이시겠어요 isigesseoyo	이시겠습니다 isigetseumnida
Connective forms with honorific
Cause/Reason		이셔 isyeo	이셔서 isyeoseo	이시니 isini	이시니까 isinikka
Contrast		이시지만 isijiman	이신데 isinde	이시더니 isideoni
Conjunction		이시고 isigo
Condition		이시면 isimyeon	이셔야 isyeoya
Noun and determiner forms with honorific
Verbal nouns		이심 isim	이시기 isigi
Past-tense verbal nouns		이셨음 isyeosseum	이셨기 isyeotgi
Determiners	Present		이신 isin
	Future		이실 isil

@TAKASUGI Shinji, Atitarev, KoreanQuoter, HappyMidnight

I've made some changes to the module for try to accommodate for ida. Please help the correctness of the paradigm above. Thanks! Wyang (talk) 04:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

If 예요 is displayed with 이에요, 였어요 must be there with 이었어요 too. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 05:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

@TAKASUGI Shinji Thanks! I added the 였.. forms to forms containing 이었.. is this correct? Wyang (talk) 06:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it’s correct. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 09:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)