Talk:abioses

RFV discussion: March–April 2022

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

abioses

·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 14:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Odd. Looks as though it should be a plural, possibly (in which case the pronunciation and audio are suspect; the last syllable of such a plural would be /iːz/, presumably). Equinox ◑ 18:57, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

@Equinox: I guess it should be speedied as created in error? ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 11:20, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Probably. My guess is that the creator saw the word somewhere (some "dictionaries", such as Scrabble word lists, include theoretical plurals that are not actually attestable) and then tried to create it by copy-pasting the singular abiosis. Still, we should let RFV run its course. Equinox ◑ 02:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

I found this, which talks of "human jerry-buildings or so-called abioses", and this, where it refers to some class of plant disease; clearly this is a countable sense of abiosis that we don't have. There is also this, which appears to be an error for abiosis based on what is visible in the snippet. Many other promising-looking results are scannos for abioseston. Nothing in IA, nothing else in Google Scholar. This, that and the other (talk) 10:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

RFV-failed, but I added the missing senses to abiosis, so this is now included as a plural form. Kiwima (talk) 22:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)