Talk:artsploitation

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
   * (cur) (last)  16:17, 27 February 2006 Hynca-Hooley m (dicdef) [rollback] [proxycheck]
   * (cur) (last) 16:16, 27 February 2006 Headphoneboy

RFC discussion: February 2012–September 2017[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


"(arts|slang) A genre of art; referring to any piece which is fueled, at its core, by a moebius of self-referential meta." What's a moebius? What is meta (noun)? What does this mean? Can someone define it in English? Equinox 21:30, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, it's a transwiki. Quite easy to spot a transwiki because they're very often unattestable, sum of parts or incomprehensible. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am seeing what looks like three good hits on books.google.com, but I can't work out the meaning from them. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I added a sense reflecting the predominate usage: exploitative art films. I haven't seen anything to support the original sense, which I take to mean art which is preoccupied with itself or the artist's self ("moebius" seems to refer to the Möbius strip, a shape that twists back on itself in an infinite loop). I think we should rfv the first sense, which may very well be a protologism (in that sense only). Chuck Entz (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]