Talk:blackhoe

RFD discussion: April 2016

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

---

blackhoe

This seems pretty rare for a misspelling entry. The only reason anyone would think to create it in the first place is the rather offensive play on words- but that's not of any lexicological significance.Chuck Entz (talk) 02:20, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Delete: too rare. I don't even regard this kind of thing as a misspelling: the phonology would be quite different because of the /l/, therefore it's really only a typo. Equinox ◑ 02:26, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

All typos in all languages is not within the remit of a dictionary. Even one as super-broad as ours. Delete. Renard Migrant (talk) 12:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 13:02, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
• Speedy, a misspelling had better be extremely common to merit an entry. - TheDaveRoss 13:18, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
• Delete as a rare misspelling: blackhoe, backhoe at Google Ngram Viewer does not find *blackhoe at all. The policy is WT:CFI#Spellings. --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:14, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
• RFD failed. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 21:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)