Talk:grafting tool
Latest comment: 9 years ago by BD2412 in topic grafting tool
Deletion discussion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/03/Green_check.svg/55px-Green_check.svg.png)
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
"A tool used in grafting" --Type56op9 (talk) 15:39, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Grafting what? Trees? Is it a horticultural tool? Donnanz (talk) 16:32, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- It's not a specific tool, it's any tool used for grafting. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Convert to
{{&lit}}
. — Ungoliant (falai) 18:51, 17 November 2014 (UTC)- Agreed. — Keφr 12:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Almost deserves an RFV: do people talking about "grafting tools" when they aren't the specific sense #2? Equinox ◑ 22:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Delete "[verb]ing tool" is just a standard way to construct an NP that refers to a 'tool for/used in [verb]ing.'. It's really a special case of "[noun] tool" ('a tool used for [noun]').
- Or maybe we should create a special L2 for these: let's call it Mentalese. It can include all the non-idiomatic translation targets that anyone can think of. Even better why not create a separate Wiki for it: WikiConcept? Its CFI need not be limited to words and phrases. DCDuring TALK 08:02, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Have you tried w:? They have managed to eschew any CFI whatsoever. — Keφr 12:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- They are conceptual and they have notability as a criterion. Language has many non-notable words. DCDuring TALK 07:32, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Have you tried w:? They have managed to eschew any CFI whatsoever. — Keφr 12:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- Funny, I would rather RFV the second sense. — Keφr 12:06, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
- That would be a good RfV. DCDuring TALK 07:32, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- But here are some Google Books hits for the tool sense. I think I own a tool like this, though perhaps not as strong. Mine is a long-bladed shovel used for digging narrow trenches. Also the sense of graft/grafting ("dig"), which [[graft]] lacks, is a different etymology from the sense relating to woody plants. DCDuring TALK 08:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- I have revised the entry and also [[graft]] to distinguish 2-3 distinct etymologies. DCDuring TALK 08:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- But here are some Google Books hits for the tool sense. I think I own a tool like this, though perhaps not as strong. Mine is a long-bladed shovel used for digging narrow trenches. Also the sense of graft/grafting ("dig"), which [[graft]] lacks, is a different etymology from the sense relating to woody plants. DCDuring TALK 08:03, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- That would be a good RfV. DCDuring TALK 07:32, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
- Keep; don't convert to &lit. This is too intransparent. Is it for verb graft sense "(transitive) To insert (a graft) in a branch or stem of another tree; to propagate by insertion in another stock; also, to insert a graft upon."? Dicts that have this: MWO[1], where it says "This word doesn't usually appear in our free dictionary, but the definition from our premium Unabridged Dictionary is offered here on a limited basis."; Webster 1913[2][3]. Some images would be nice. --Dan Polansky (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
No consensus to delete. bd2412 T 01:38, 13 January 2015 (UTC)