Talk:k

Latin section

Currently, at k#Latin it says:

• "The letter of the Latin alphabet, written in the Latin script."

Shouldn't it say:

• "The [#][th/nd/st/rd] letter of the Latin alphabet, written in the Latin script.", or
• "A letter of the Latin alphabet, written in the Latin script."

instead? --Bringback2ndpersonverbs (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

@Bringback2ndpersonverbs:  Done —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 18:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

RFV discussion: December 2017–December 2018

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

k

Rfv-sense (Portuguese): “(Internet, Brazil) Abbreviation of o que.” — Ungoliant ^(falai) 01:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

• RFV failed; removed by User:Gamren in diff. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

  Oh, sorry.__Gamren (talk) 16:40, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

  Oh, I don't mean to criticize your removal. I think it was appropriate. I'm just stating what happened for the record once the discussion is archived. —Granger (talk · contribs) 23:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

  Yes, thank you. I should have done that when I deleted the sense, but sometimes I forget.__Gamren (talk) 11:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

/keɪ/

Why is it pronounced /keɪ/, just as "j" is /jei/? --Backinstadiums (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Great Vowel Shift. Fay Freak (talk) 21:38, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

RFV discussion: July 2019–April 2021

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

---

k, m, q

Should be K., M., Q. (cp. Category:Latin praenominal abbreviations). --Brown*Toad (talk) 09:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

RFV-failed, moved per nom. - -sche (discuss) 00:27, 6 April 2021 (UTC)