Talk:sensorispecific

RFV discussion: October–November 2018

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.

---

sensorispecific

Foreigner's one-off error in PLOS ONE. (We should be very careful about citing PLOS ONE because it isn't edited and has all kinds of errors. It's not like other science journals.) Equinox ◑ 23:23, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

I think you're about 30,000 entries late on not citing PLOS ONE. DTLHS (talk) 23:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

There's also a cite in Neurophysiology. Kiwima (talk) 00:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

• But blogs, books and newspapers are not peer-reviewed (I assume that's what you meant by edited) and we allow those. SemperBlotto (talk) 04:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  • (But according to its Wikipedia page, it is peer-reviewed.) SemperBlotto (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

No, I don't mean peer-reviewed. I mean basic editing for spelling and grammar. Unlike mainstream English-language newspapers, PLOS ONE accepts international material from China etc. and doesn't fix up the English at all. You shouldn't create obvious misspellings that only occur in one PLOS ONE article. Equinox ◑ 07:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

But taking SemperBlotto's point, newsgroups are not edited, and we allow those. Kiwima (talk) 04:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

RFV-passed, but only if we allow the inclusion of alt forms. Kiwima (talk) 03:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)