Talk:structural
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
"Used in building." Sorry what, does this mean that a hammer is structural? Mglovesfun (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- RFV it? It might be redundant to sense 1. Equinox ◑ 18:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good now--WF on Holiday (talk) 16:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
Sense 3: "That is lasting. economics". Equinox ◑ 20:30, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like a misinterpretation of sense 1 to me (e.g. talking about the structural problems of an economy). —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 10:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Only some uses of structural in economics have it interpretable as "lasting" (eg, structural inequality, structural inflation), but some don't (eg, structural adjustment, usage in econometrics such as structural model). IOW, even with attestation (which arguably could be found, though the definition might still be ambiguous), this definition would be very vulnerable to RfD. DCDuring (talk) 15:43, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- Failed Denazz (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2024 (UTC)