Talk:zero gravity

Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tea Room discussion[edit]

See Special:PermanentLink/24549090#zero gravity. DCDuring TALK 21:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Teacup clipart.svg

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Tea room.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

  1. The state of apparent weightlessness which occurs when in free fall.
  2. A state/shuttle/simulator which produces weightlessness.

I'm not sure exactly what sense 2 means, but is it not just listing examples of sense 1? Michael Z. 2011-12-14 00:12 z

1 is a state (situation); 2 is a machine.​—msh210 (talk) 00:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Not getting it. Does shuttle mean “space shuttle?” I can't imagine how or when such a device is called “zero gravity.” Other dictionaries aren't helping me. Citation? Michael Z. 2011-12-14 03:54 z
You are getting it, then. (Well, if I am, then you are.) 2 is, yes, a space shuttle. Like you, I've never heard of this meaning of zero gravity; perhaps {{rfquote-sense}} or {{rfv-sense}}?​—msh210 (talk) 05:28, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
I'm quite certain that a space shuttle doesn't produce weightlessness. Having stared at this for a day, I believe it is nonsense. A bit of rewriting and rfv-sense, I think. Michael Z. 2011-12-14 15:10 z
WT:RFV#zero gravityMichael Z. 2011-12-14 15:30 z
It definitely produces weightlessness. Anyway, the sense 2 seems to be a nonsense. — TAKASUGI Shinji (talk) 18:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Being in free fall, including being in orbit, leads to weightlessness, enshuttled or otherwise. A shuttle can be used to put you there, but to say that the machine “produces” the state implies some mechanism that doesn't exist. Michael Z. 2011-12-15 01:11 z
More precisely, being within any free-falling object produces a state equivalent to that of "weightlessness". However, "weightlessness" is a misnomer as the object does not actually lose all weight during its fall; objects simply are not resting against a static surface. "Weightlessness" can occur in a falling elevator, at the crest of a roller coaster, or inside a plane specially designed to free-fall with astronaut trainees inside. So, the second "definition" results from attributive use of the noun's primary definition and is not distinct. --EncycloPetey 03:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

RFV discussion: December 2011[edit]

Keep tidy.svg

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).

Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.

Rfv-sense “A state/shuttle/simulator which produces weightlessness.” makes no sense to me. Michael Z. 2011-12-14 15:25 z

Nor to me, sounds countable so you should be able to say "that simulator is a good zero gravity". Sounds like tosh. Mglovesfun (talk) 18:25, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Ergo delete. --Hekaheka 18:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete. Seems it was added by a dodgy anon - see here. None of the dictionaries or encyclopaedias I've consulted have this extra sense anyway. ---> Tooironic 23:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Done. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

What happened to 30 days?​—msh210 (talk) 17:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
@msh210, it's a speedy deletion and like any speedy deletion, can be reversed if controversial. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)