Template talk:ekk
Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic RFM
RFM
[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
We should delete this and use Template:et. Compare WT:RFM#Template:lvs. - -sche (discuss) 22:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- I agree, delete. —CodeCat 22:30, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete from what I can tell, w:Standard Estonian language just redirects to Estonian language, suggesting they are the same. This is why oppose the idea that anything in ISO 639 should be allowed as a language. If it had zero errors, then sure, but it doesn't! Mglovesfun (talk) 09:59, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Someone needs to update WT:LANGTREAT when templates referenced there are deleted Chuck Entz (talk) 16:49, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
- Done (the template was not used in any entries or categories). As with
{{lvs}}: we usually keep dialect codes even when we consider dialects to be a single language (for some reason...even though it seems to me to unnecessarily open the door for the dialect codes to be improperly used), but we do not keep three-letter 'copies' of two-letter codes, so I have removed{{ekk}}, like{{lvs}}, from WT:LANGTREAT (which still notes the separateness of Latgalian from{{lt}}, and of Võro from{{et}}). - -sche (discuss) 18:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)