Template talk:oldconfix
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFDO deleted
RFDO deleted
[edit]
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Unused template, superseded by {{confix}} and {{affix}}. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 19:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It wouldn't even work in its current state, it uses templates we've replaced long ago. —CodeCat 19:11, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- And yet it was created only 5 months ago. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 20:30, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- I wonder why DCDuring did it, then? Was it a migration thing, migrating from an old to a new template, and was intended to be deleted when no longer used? It doesn't matter of course, delete either way. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- Ping.—msh210℠ (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- I was, have been, and remain concerned about the arbitrary revision of our infrastructure to little good end. I foolishly thought that it would be possible and useful to retain the vestiges of older and IMHO more accessible methods in the face of a headlong rush to remove most infrastructure from influence by more or less normal contributors. It seems like the forces of evil have won. DCDuring TALK 00:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Ping.—msh210℠ (talk) 20:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
- I wonder why DCDuring did it, then? Was it a migration thing, migrating from an old to a new template, and was intended to be deleted when no longer used? It doesn't matter of course, delete either way. Renard Migrant (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
- RFD failed. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)