User:Mnemosientje/Gothic

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

(This page serves as an overview for me to keep track of progress on my long-term project of improving Wiktionary's coverage of the Gothic language. You're welcome to help out with any of the to-do's found here!)

Since virtually every attested form has now been added, remaining tasks are mainly the improvement of existing entries and the addition of proper nouns and their attested forms. For example, see Category:Gothic entry maintenance, and add topic/set categories where applicable. Category:Requests for etymologies in Gothic entries‎ and Category:Requests for expansion of etymologies in Gothic entries‎ can probably do with some trimming as well.

Statistics[edit]

Useful links[edit]

Stuff to do[edit]

Misc[edit]

Adding lemmata[edit]

Virtually every attested form has now been added to Wiktionary. What remains to be added:

  • Proper nouns at http://www.wulfila.be/gothic/browse/lemmata/?pos=1 Most of these remain to be added, and those that have been added often lack inflected form entries on Wiktionary. The romanizations, when created, should not be capitalized initially; see 𐌼𐌰𐌺𐌹𐌳𐍉𐌽𐌾𐌰 (makidōnja) for an example. (= sometimes done, as on wulfila.be, for ease of reading, but as a transliteration is an anachronism; Gothic is an uncial script which does not distinguish between upper/lowercase)
  • Glosses from all mss, and words from some of the more obscure sources (e.g. the Codex Vindobonensis 795 or the Mangup inscriptions) may also remain to be added. (Koebler lists them among the attestations; ctrl+f "GlA ", "GlA;", etc)
  • Forms that are only attested as a contraction, like jag-gapaidoda may still be absent (add as if two words, thus don't add an entry jaggapaidoda but only gapaidoda).

Irregular words requiring attention[edit]

Found in Category:Requests for inflections in Gothic entries, these often inflect irregularly and will probably need separate templates; deal with them whenever. They are among the very few lemma entries that don't have entries for all attested forms yet.

Also, words needing special/adjusted inflection templates:

  • 𐍈𐌰𐍃 (ƕas), 𐍈𐌰𐌶𐌿𐌷 (ƕazuh) (because of 𐍈𐍉 (ƕō) and 𐍈𐍉𐌷 (ƕōh), respectively)
  • U-stem nouns ending in -jus get a weird nom pl in current inflection tables, eg drunjus and the various compounds with *waddjus. No nom pl is attested for any u-stem with a -jus nom sg, so probably a custom inflection table needs to be made clarifying this.

Nota bene[edit]