Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.
If you are unfamiliar with wiki editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.
These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:
- Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy documenting how Wiktionary pages should be formatted. All entries should conform to this standard. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing page for a similar word, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
- Our Criteria for inclusion (CFI) define exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary, though it may be a bit technical and longwinded. The most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
- If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
- The FAQ aims to answer most of your remaining questions, and there are several help pages that you can browse for more information.
- A glossary of our technical jargon, and some hints for dealing with the more common communication issues.
- If you have anything to ask about or suggest, we have several discussion rooms. Feel free to ask any other editors in person if you have any problems or question, by posting a message on their talk page.
You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage. This shows which languages you know, so other editors know which languages you'll be working on, and what they can ask you for help with.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wiktionarian! If you have any questions, bring them to the Wiktionary:Information desk, or ask me on my talk page. If you do so, please sign your posts with four tildes: ~~~~ which automatically produces your username and the current date and time.
Inserting Armenian into Etymologies
I reverted your edits to du and to team because they were obviously wrong. Just sounding like a similar word isn't reason to say that one came from the other, or that they're related in a particular way. They can be inherited from a common ancestor, or borrowed from a common source, or even just happen to similar by coincidence (with the millions of combinations of words possible between two languages, this happens all the time). It takes knowledge of the history of the words in the two languages to tell. If you don't know the difference, you shouldn't be editing etymologies. In some ways, putting bad information in etymologies is a worse kind of vandalism than writing "poop" or blanking pages, because it's not as easy to spot, and it may stay long enough for people to be misinformed.
Also, I would advise putting known Armenian cognates in every etymology. In the case of du, they're no doubt related via common inheritance from Proto-Indo-European, but so are similar terms in literally hundreds of languages. They should be limited to cases where there are historical connections, or where the etymology is showing cognates in multiple branches of the Indo-European languages (not counting English, which is treated differently because this is English Wiktionary).
I'm spending the time to explain this because I've seen too many unnecessary cognates in languages like Kurdish and Albanian littering hundreds of etymologies where they don't belong, and I don't want the same thing to happen with Armenian.
This is nothing against Armenian, which is a remarkable language that's of great value in Indo-European studies. With all the pressure from other languages and everything that's been done to the Armenian people, it's a miracle that it exists at all. You have every reason to be proud of your language- so the last thing you should want is for your language to be viewed as intrusive clutter, like spam. Chuck Entz (talk) 19:51, 14 February 2014 (UTC)