Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2012-04/User:WarddrBOT for bot status

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:WarddrBOT for bot status[edit]

  • Vote ends: 23:59 20 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 13:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Discussion:

Support[edit]

  1. Support --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC) The bot seems to be doing its job successfully, so I'll support this until told otherwise.[reply]
    Good point, opposers. The only reason I'm not changing my vote is because it looks like the vote will fail anyway, and there's still a chance that Warddr will add the info. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 13:41, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Equinox 15:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC) Assuming that we need this — I know User:Interwicket doesn't run any more. Equinox 15:32, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    See Special:Contributions/Luckas-bot and Special:Contributions/VolkovBot.​—msh210 (talk) 15:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. (late) Support, because it is helpful to have several bots adding interwikis, and the only concern the oppose voters have seems to be that we already have interwiki bots. - -sche (discuss) 01:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Oppose per the nonanswer on the talkpage. I'll gladly change my vote if an acceptable answer's posted.​—msh210 (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC) Rescinded my opposition per the answers on the talkpage. Still not supporting, as I have no particular reason to think this bot is necessary (can anyone confirm one way or the other?), considering that Luckas-bot and VolkovBot both do interwiki.​—msh210 (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Same reason, bot owners need to be able to communicate with the rest of the community, even interwiki bots where the tasks *ought to be* straightforward. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I answered on the talk page of this page. If you contact me on my talkpage you can reach me very quick (this answer is written little over an hour after a question on my (Dutch) talk page) - Warddr (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain[edit]

Decision[edit]

This messy vote seems to have been (officially) closed when the votes were at 2-0-0, so I believe that it passes. I will unblock the bot account, but we need a 'crat to grant bot privileges and notify Warddr at nl.wikt. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 01:10, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flag granted. —Stephen (Talk) 05:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]