Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User:Nbarth for admin[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. Support --RuakhTALK 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Weak support: I haven't interacted with Nbarth, but the contributions look good. Equinox 21:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support. Have seen this user around a lot, always doing useful things. Kind of thought he was an admin. -- Visviva 00:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Benevolent contributor, has done a lot of nice work on etymology-related guideline pages (WT:ETY, W:AJ/E etc.) --Ivan Štambuk 09:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support Very helpful. --Bequw¢τ 18:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support EncycloPetey 03:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Yes. --Neskaya contribstalk? 01:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Supportblurpeace (talk) 03:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Support Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC) - Seems good. Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Volants 13:47, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Seems solid. DCDuring TALK 23:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[edit]

Abstain[edit]

  1. Abstain While I haven't seen Nbarth in action for a while, I would have opposed at that point. A quick scan of contributions doesn't reveal many areas in which having extra tools would be useful; though that's always a chicken-and-egg problem. Conrad.Irwin 22:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Abstain - doesn't ever seem to have repaired vandalism or done anything similar SemperBlotto 11:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Abstain per SemperBlotto. I cannot find that many instances in which having the extra tools would be beneficial to the English Wiktionary after quickly scanning this users' most recent contributions. Razorflame 18:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decision[edit]