Wiktionary talk:Previously deleted entries
Since this duplicates WT:LOP so well, I wonder how this will all turn out.
Hey, waitasec. Why isn't the archive a sub-page of the page it is archiving?
--Connel MacKenzie 03:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Answer to my own question: because this is merely an index to the real archives. --Connel MacKenzie 03:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Note to self: My plan is to move this to Appendix:Failed entries and redirect Appendix:rfdfailed there as well. The combined listing will be sub-pages of WT:PT, and will not contain the RFD discussion text, instead, only links to the discussion page removal (by using the "&oldid=" trick.) The combined result will be auto-generated from XML full-history dumps, to get the revisionID of WT:RFV or WT:RFD correct. The WT:GP messages on this topic have been archived somewhere. I've added this note so I can find this particular page more easily. --Connel MacKenzie 21:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)