바다: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

External tools: Page statistics • Find when text was added/removed


Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

15 April 2024

31 August 2023

29 August 2023

28 August 2023

18 August 2023

22 July 2023

15 July 2023

18 March 2023

3 February 2023

3 January 2023

15 August 2022

15 July 2022

1 July 2022

24 April 2022

20 February 2022

30 August 2021

17 August 2021

7 August 2021

2 June 2021

6 May 2021

21 April 2021

28 March 2021

22 March 2021

8 February 2021

7 February 2021

6 February 2021

25 January 2021

16 November 2020

10 November 2020

  • curprev 12:5512:55, 10 November 2020Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs 2,809 bytes +130 Undo revision 61085967 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) i will explain to you how the stdict.korean etymology section (not naver dictionary, naver just ports from other dictionaries) works in your talk page. and again, mentioning 용비어천가 is misleading. 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 is an extremely common word in mk sources and specifying "in 용비어천가" suggests that it is a rare word found only in that source. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 12:4712:47, 10 November 2020B2V22BHARAT talk contribs 2,679 bytes −130 The naver dictionary still lists both 바닿〮 and 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 as the etymology for 바다 and there is no need to erase 용비어천가 part. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 12:4112:41, 10 November 2020Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs 2,809 bytes +130 Undo revision 61085934 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 is attested not only in 용비어천가, but in 두시언해, 월인천강지곡, 악학궤범, etc. "had the alternative form 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 in 용비어천가, 1445" implies that it was attested _only_ in 용비어천가. it was actually attested in all sorts of MK sources so there is no need to specify what source this comes from. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 12:3812:38, 10 November 2020B2V22BHARAT talk contribs 2,679 bytes −130 I understand what you're trying to say, but Naver Dictionary records both 바닿 and 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 as the etymology for sea and that's why I put it. I don't understand why you keep erasing 용비어천가 part, since 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 is indeed recorded in 용비어천가 in 1445. ?? undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 12:3212:32, 10 November 2020Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs 2,809 bytes +130 Undo revision 61085881 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) 1) stdict.korean gives both 바닿 and 바랄 as MK forms of 바다. given sound changes involved (on which see lee and ramsey 2011, or really any works on 국어사), 바닿 is the ancestor; 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 should produce modern 바를 (which is indeed what we find in jeju, which preserves the mk form). frankly i don't think you understand the format of 국어사전. if you want i can explain the stdict.korean formatting to you. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 12:2612:26, 10 November 2020B2V22BHARAT talk contribs 2,679 bytes −130 Stop calling me ill-equipped. I'm mainly referring to the naver dictionary website that quotes both 용비어천가 and 월인천강지곡 as the etymology for 바다(sea), See(보다) and I believe in Naver Korean Dictionary more which is supported by a majority of Korean linguists rather than foreigner you alone. https://ko.dict.naver.com/#/entry/koko/ffd4564ce3004d6ebb6f08b0c8452070 undo Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • curprev 12:0412:04, 10 November 2020Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs 2,809 bytes +1 →‎Etymology undo
  • curprev 12:0412:04, 10 November 2020Karaeng Matoaya talk contribs 2,808 bytes +129 Undo revision 61085759 by B2V22BHARAT (talk) 바ᄅᆞᆯ〮 is attested in 균여전 and a wide array of other fifteenth-century middle korean sources (off the top of my head 청산별곡 "바라래살어리랏다", not just 용비어천가. please stop reverting correct edits you are underequipped to deal with. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 11:4611:46, 10 November 2020B2V22BHARAT talk contribs 2,679 bytes −129 Don't erase 용비어천가 part. undo Tags: Undo Reverted
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)