不只
Chinese
[edit]not; no | only; merely; just only; merely; just; but | ||
---|---|---|---|
simp. and trad. (不只) |
不 | 只 |
Pronunciation
[edit]- Mandarin
- (Standard Chinese)
- Hanyu Pinyin:
- Zhuyin: ㄅㄨˋ ㄓˇ
- Tongyong Pinyin: bùjhǐh
- Wade–Giles: pu4-chih3
- Yale: bù-jř
- Gwoyeu Romatzyh: bujyy
- Palladius: бучжи (bučži)
- Sinological IPA (key): /pu⁵¹ ʈ͡ʂʐ̩²¹⁴⁻²¹⁽⁴⁾/
- Homophones:
[Show/Hide] 不只
不止
- (Standard Chinese)
- Cantonese
- (Standard Cantonese, Guangzhou–Hong Kong)
- Jyutping: bat1 zi2
- Yale: bāt jí
- Cantonese Pinyin: bat7 dzi2
- Guangdong Romanization: bed1 ji2
- Sinological IPA (key): /pɐt̚⁵ t͡siː³⁵/
- Homophones:
不只
不止
- (Standard Cantonese, Guangzhou–Hong Kong)
- Southern Min
Conjunction
[edit]不只
Synonyms
[edit]- 不但 (bùdàn)
- 不僅/不仅 (bùjǐn)
- 不光 (bùguāng)
- 不單/不单 (bùdān)
- 不惟 (bùwéi) (literary)
- 不止 (bùzhǐ)
- 不特 (bùtè) (literary)
- 不獨/不独 (bùdú)
- 不直 (bùzhí) (literary)
- 不論/不论 (bùlùn) (literary)
- 伓止 (ēng-cǐ) (Northern Min, Hokkien)
- 勿僅/勿仅 (8veq-jin) (Wu)
- 勿僅僅/勿仅仅 (8veq-jin-jin) (Wu)
- 勿光 (8veq-kuaon) (Wu)
- 唔只 (m4 zi2) (Cantonese)
- 唔單/唔单 (m6 duan1) (Teochew)
- 唔單只/唔单只 (m4 daan1 zi2) (Cantonese, Teochew)
- 唔淨只/唔净只 (m4 zing6 zi2) (Cantonese)
- 毋但 (Hokkien)
- 豈但/岂但 (qǐdàn) (literary)
- 非但 (fēidàn)
- 非獨/非独 (fēidú)
- 非論/非论 (fēilùn) (literary)
Old Korean
[edit]Etymology
[edit]Potentially a compound of *an (ancestral negating root) + *to (semantically light noun meaning "objective fact", whence Middle Korean ᄃᆞ (to)) + *-k (some kind of suffix).
Adverb
[edit]不只 (*ANTOk)
- cannot; denotes inability to carry out the verb
Usage notes
[edit]This form is used by the mainstream "Yogācārabhūmi-Śāstra glossing tradition" of Interpretive Gugyeol, referring to all Korean-language glosses to the Buddhist canon up to 1300 except for two glosses of excerpts of the Avatamsaka Sutra and a recently discovered gloss of the Sutra of the Repentance Ritual of Great Compassion, all three of which share idiosyncratic features including the use of what appears to be a graphic abbreviation of 毛冬 (“cannot”).
As with Middle and Modern Korean (see 못 (mot) and 못하다 (mothada)), the Old Korean 不只 construction had two forms: a short form in which the adverb directly preceded the negated verb, and a long form in which the adverb negated the verb 爲 (*hoy-, “to do”) similar to English do-support. However, unlike in Middle and Modern Korean, 爲 did not act as a true auxiliary verb, as the main verb was nominalized to become the direct object of 爲.
According to the analysis of Mun Hyeon-su, when the main verb was modified by another adverb, word order in the long form construction of 不只 differed from the long form construction of 毛冬:
- Yogācārabhūmi-Śāstra tradition: [NOMINALIZED VERB] [ADVERB] 不只 (*ANTOk) 爲 (*hoy-)
- Avatamsaka Sutra tradition: [NOMINALIZED VERB] 毛冬 (*mwotol) [ADVERB] 爲 (*hoy-)
- Middle and Modern Korean: [ADVERB] [MAIN VERB] 못 (mot) 하 (ha-)
Reconstruction notes
[edit]The final phonogram 只 denotes the coda consonant *-k.
This adverb is not attested in Middle Korean Idu script. However, some sixteenth-century Chinese-Korean glossaries for use by schoolchildren gloss the Chinese word 不 as 안ᄃᆞᆨ (Yale: antok), of uncertain meaning. As this is the only known negative ending with *-k in Middle Korean sources and as the Middle Korean glossary genre is celebrated for linguistic archaisms, Old Korean 不只 is conventionally reconstructed as *ANTOk. This also matches 不知 (*ANti) and 不冬 (*ANtol), which use the same logogram.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- 문현수 (Mun Hyeon-su) (2019) “석독구결의 능력부정에 대한 연구 [A study of ability negation in interpretive gugyeol]”, in Gugeosa Yeon'gu, volume 28, , pages 269–298
- Mandarin terms with homophones
- Cantonese terms with homophones
- Chinese lemmas
- Mandarin lemmas
- Cantonese lemmas
- Hokkien lemmas
- Chinese conjunctions
- Mandarin conjunctions
- Cantonese conjunctions
- Hokkien conjunctions
- Chinese terms with IPA pronunciation
- Chinese terms spelled with 不
- Chinese terms spelled with 只
- Mandarin terms with usage examples
- Old Korean lemmas
- Old Korean adverbs
- Intermediate Mandarin