Category talk:HTML

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Equinox in topic RFV discussion: May–December 2011
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: May–December 2011

[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


The following members of Category:HTML have been nominated for verification, presumably as they are listed as English, though in reality, they aren't. Listed in subsections as follows:

Mglovesfun (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mglovesfun (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mglovesfun (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mglovesfun (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mglovesfun (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

google groups:"an|a|the nbsp after|before|in" suffices to show use in English. Someone with knowledge of what collocates to use in other Usenet-popular languages can run a similar search for them.​—msh210 (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I suggest changing the language header to translingual. It's not really English.--Dmol 08:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
That's an excellent first step; the second issue, for me, I'm not the original tagger, that was Hippietrail in 2007, the second question is are these words in any language? Do they convey meaning for a human reader? Granted that's purely an RFD issue. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:11, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I think that these are purely English initialisms, acronyms and abbreviations. Nbsp, for example stands for the English words non-breaking space (c.f. the nbsp character), and surely not any other words in any other languages. The unicode then ends with a semicolon, much like how the period is a stopper to the end of a sentence. TeleComNasSprVen 01:07, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
If you want to find citations for these in English, go ahead. --Mglovesfun (talk) 15:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Not in that form, it isn't [1]. The attested versions of the term in the link always have an ampersand preceding the term and a semicolon following it, even though they are declarations of the unicode character. Having them treat it as a single form, however, would mean that nbsp needs to be changed to " " as an entry title. TeleComNasSprVen 00:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Again, could that be attested in English with any sort of 'meaning'? Is it a noun, or what? --Mglovesfun (talk) 13:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
It's like the literally thousands of keywords in computer programming languages. Not dict material. Equinox 15:29, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Should be moved to WT:RFD. Used as jargons by a very limited group of people who deal with programming on a regular basis. Next thing you know people will start including common SQL commands like DBCC, sp_who and etc... JamesjiaoTC 04:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
Did no one notice the link I posted above to a list of sufficiently many hits, without ampersands, in running English text, of this term?​—msh210 (talk) 06:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
[[nbsp]] passes RFV. - -sche (discuss) 19:44, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Failed the others. Equinox 15:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply