Category talk:Spanish verbs with irregular past participles

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Genecioso in topic RFD discussion: December 2017–May 2018
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFD discussion: December 2017–May 2018[edit]

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


@Kc kennylau, I could delete this as an empty category, but perhaps you or somebody else would like to actually make it fill again? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Metaknowledge Category:Spanish irregular verbs in the past participle. DTLHS (talk) 03:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I have to admit, that is a worse name. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:33, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge Which is a worse name? The one DTLHS mentioned? I guess we have to modify Module:es-conj if we want to switch the names. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The one that is actually used. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Metaknowledge, DTLHS: This edit does the trick, but the problem is that it changes all the other "irregular" categories as well: Spanish irregular verbs in the gerund > Spanish verbs with irregular gerunds, Spanish irregular verbs in the subjunctive imperfect‎ > CAT:Spanish verbs with irregular subjunctive imperfects, etc. The last one strikes me as wrong. Shouldn't the mood and tense be switched? ("... with imperfect subjunctives") --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 12:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Per utramque cavernam: That edit looks fine. You just have to reverse the order of tense and mood. I don't think there's any case where mood goes before tense. — Eru·tuon 20:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Gente como tú, Ultimateria, Hillcrest98: There are many new categories at anteponer (for example). Should we go ahead and create them? --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 18:00, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply