Module talk:Quotations/sa/data

@DerekWinters, माधवपंडित If we filled this up with data, adding Sanskrit quotations from Monier would be a lot easier I think. So far, I've added the Rig-Veda and the Ramayana, so we can type eg. {{Q|sa||RV}} and get

c. 1700 BCE – 1200 BCE, Ṛgveda

. —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 19:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

There's also the question of whether we write the titles and author names in Sanskrit, IAST, or the regular English spelling without diacritics. I'm in favor of IAST personally. —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 19:27, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

I'll add the ones I come across, but I usually don't do much with Sanskrit. DerekWinters (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

But I agree with IAST. That's what I did for Old Marathi: ससा. DerekWinters (talk) 20:43, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

@Aryamanarora: Could I recommend your moving the contents of Appendix:Sanskrit abbreviations over? I think that would be quite useful. —JohnC5 01:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@JohnC5: That's the plan, eventually. —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 01:50, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Wow... this looks so beautiful & neat. Gotta love the IAST spelling! Thanks so much Aryaman. Edit: just one thing. This article and some others say that the Rigveda was "essentially complete" by 1200 BC. Perhaps it should then be 1700 BCE - 1200 BCE? - Madhav P. (talk) 01:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC) @Aryamanarora forgot to page - Madhav P. (talk) 02:17, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Linking

@Aryamanarora, traditionally we link to the wikisource in the original language, so s:sa:ऋग्वेदः. We'll need to create a few functions, but I think we should be going to the Sanskrit, not the translations. —JohnC5 17:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Any idea why it's not working? —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 19:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Aryamanarora: I'm working on it. @Erutuon, do you know how we can get the to_Indian function in Module:foreign numerals to be used to convert for the .rlFormat1? —JohnC5 19:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@JohnC5: I'm sort of at sea when it comes to these modules, but I think you can make data.Sundry.numeralConvert be a function that calls the function you mention. — Eru·tuon 19:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Nope. If it's a function, it has to be in the main module, like sema.numToRoman, because mw.loadData can't load a module whose exported table contains functions. — Eru·tuon 19:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Aryamanarora, Erutuon: I did it. —JohnC5 20:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

That's great! I'll try to do it for some other ones too. —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 20:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Abbreviations

@Aryamanarora, if it's not too much trouble, I was hoping we could follow some principles about adding new things from Appendix:Sanskrit abbreviations. If the abbreviation is a title of a work with an author, create the author section and then add an alias to the author list works that reroutes to the author and work. Does that make sense? You can look at HYog for an example. —JohnC5 17:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

@JohnC5: Yeah, that does make it easier to convert from {{sa-a}}. I'll do that for sure. —Aryaman ^{(मुझसे बात करो)} 17:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

"Ṛgveda 6.9.1" → s:sa:ऋग्वेद: सूक्तं nil.nil @ अर्जुन

I assume "nil.nil" is a bug? @JohnC5, AryamanA, Erutuon. —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 04:21, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Suzukaze-c: Yep. Fixed. — Eru·tuon 04:53, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Parashara Smriti

@Bhagadatta This is a link to quotations in Parasharasmriti with translations. I was wondering whether we could use these quotes. Since Wikipedia has no specific article for this, we can link to [[w:Parashara#Texts_attributed_to_Parashara|Parāśara Smṛti]]. I've seen it spelt as Pārāśara-Smṛti ({{vrddhi|sa|parāśara}}) also but that's not as common as Parāśara Smṛti (which is even in MW). I'm unsure of the year(s) of its composition: some date it too early (around Rigveda) or too late (like 1800 or so) to be considered correct. What do you think? 🔥ಶಬ್ದಶೋಧಕ🔥 06:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

@SodhakSH: It's fine to be added. The year does not need to be specified (I think). -- 𝓑𝓱𝓪𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓽𝓽𝓪^{(𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓴)} 07:42, 2 June 2021 (UTC)