Talk:1

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

un-redirect 1[edit]

Done Rmo13 17:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Rfd-sense: (text messaging) Misspelling of !.

As per Talk:/, there are many misspellings based on keyboard layouts out there, and we really shouldn't cover them. There's already another sense for the deliberate usage right below. -- Liliana 22:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong delete, would we accept s as a misspelling of a? Mglovesfun (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A very misleading entry! I think this must be referring to the Internet habit of expressing fake enthusiasm like THAT IS SO COOL!!!!!11. Equinox 14:05, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That seems to be covered by the third definition. I agree with deleting the second one. Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV 15:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not cat vs kat, this is just typeing the wrong letter, not genuine belief in 1 being an !Lucifer 03:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.​—msh210 (talk) 17:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RFC discussion: November–December 2010[edit]

See Talk:0#RFC discussion: November–December 2010.

Appendix[edit]

@JainismWikipedia Hello. The entry for 1 does not belong here (because 1 is not a word in Sanskrit). It would instead belong to a Appendix:Sanskrit verbs (compare Appendix:Spanish verbs). DerekWinters (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC) @JainismWikipedian Repinging. DerekWinters (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed it. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करेंयोगदान) 22:28, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

between 0.5 and 1.5[edit]

In science, however, "1" as a measurement can be anything between 0.5 and 1.5 unless it is written as 1.0 (with 2 significant figures.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:1#the_real_number_1_as_a_recurring_decimal:_1.000... --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]