Talk:cabáiste
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV in topic RFV discussion
RFV discussion
[edit]This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
While searching for Kumst, I found words like Russian капуста (kapústa), Latvian kāposti, Georgian კომბოსტო (ḳombosṭo), Hungarian káposzta, Tatar кәбестә (käbestä), the etymology at kapusta (from Proto-Slavic *kǫpus(ta)) looks better to me. --80.114.178.7 23:04, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- The change of English/Anglo-Norman /dʒ/ to /ʃtʲ/ in perfectly regular in Irish; there are dozens of words where it happened. And considering the languages Irish has been in contact with, a borrowing from English/Anglo-Norman is way more likely than a borrowing from Slavic. —Angr 23:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am not assuming Irish borrowed from Slavic, I'm assuming Irish and English/Anglo-Norman borrowed the same Wanderwort from Latin. --80.114.178.7 23:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Irish borrowings from Latin directly tended to be much earlier: Old and Middle Irish. Cabáiste doesn't seem to show up that early, but instead much later when borrowing from Anglo-Norman or English directly is much more plausible. It also fits phonetically with such an etymology. DIL (Gregory Toner, Sharon Arbuthnot, Máire Ní Mhaonaigh, Marie-Luise Theuerkauf, Dagmar Wodtko, editors (2019), “cabáiste”, in eDIL: Electronic Dictionary of the Irish Language) just says "Engl. loanword". --Catsidhe (verba, facta) 07:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- I am not assuming Irish borrowed from Slavic, I'm assuming Irish and English/Anglo-Norman borrowed the same Wanderwort from Latin. --80.114.178.7 23:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Don't forget that Proto-Slavic isn't all that ancient. The Proto-Slavic form could be a borrowing from Latin. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not rfv material as no definition is being called into question. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- What about
{{rfv-etymology}}
then? —CodeCat 14:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)- Spot on. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- What about
- The descriptions at kupus/купус say that Proto-Slavic *kǫpus(ta) is taken from Latin composita. I should have mentioned those links before, my apologies, I thought all links to it mentioned the Latin source. --80.114.178.7 19:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not rfv material as no definition is being called into question. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Closed. Not an RFV. — Ungoliant (Falai) 05:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)