Empty "etymology" sections. If not "unknown", they are derived from same source, with someone theorizing that they may be different. We are still supposed to remove bogus subdivisions like this, right? --Connel MacKenzie 23:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Only one of the sections was blank, so this was easily fixed. If someone wants to add an etymology they can just add the section back. DAVilla 15:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
plural of ho
the plural is hos, is it not? since when is it acceptable to write hoes as a plural of ho?
- It's been that way for a while. The earliest orccurnce that I've seen it is the 90s LeemanBros (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)