Talk:saw

I think the translations of the past tense are setting a bad precedent here, with reams of verbs in the imperfect and past historic. My feeling is that these translations belong in the foreign-language dictionaries, linked as follows:

English

saw

1. past tense of see

...

English

see

Translations

• French: voir

...

voir

French

Conjugation

• Present: vois, vois, voit ... (etc)
• Imperfect: ... (etc)

The above are three different entries in Wiktionary. I agree mostly. Although the problem is mostly for past tenses. Past participles do translate ok/unambiguously most of the time.Polyglot 10:44, 17 Dec 2003 (UTC)