Talk:suck off

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Barytonesis in topic Tea room convo
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RFV discussion: February–May 2017[edit]

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


def: "(slang, transitive) To fellate a man, usually until he ejaculates."

I question whether this definition is correct in two regards:

  1. Is it limited to "man"?
  2. Isn't it always to the point of ejaculation (excluding instances of interruption)?
Isn't there a sense of off#Adverb that we lack, to wit, that reflected in get off, suck off, jerk off, wank off and any similar expressions. (You may guess where this is going.) DCDuring TALK 13:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
It wouldn't necessarily have to be a man, since pre-surgery transgender women have penises as well (though, depending on your politics, you may or may not view them as men still). Anyway, I suppose you could go out and find porn where dildoes are sucked off as well. Given that last point, and given the existence of coitus reservatus and orgasm control, I don't think the sucked-off object, be it a penis or a pseudo-penis, necessarily must ejaculate during a sucking-off. There's a few sentences I didn't expect to write today.Kleio (t · c) 17:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Silly me. I meant to also require support for "he ejaculates" (rather than "orgasm"). Lastly one can find abundant citations of "[suck] her off", so "fellate" seems wrong.
IOW, can we show that the existing definition is correct, rather than simply wrong in multiple ways. DCDuring TALK 20:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
I found this citation:
  • Lua error in Module:quote at line 2664: Parameter 1 is required.
Also, the definition is not worded as a transitive verb, the object being expressly included in the definition and the object is solely a person rather than being worded to include "sexual organ". The more I think about it the more amateurish the definition is. DCDuring TALK 20:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I have emmended the definition. RFV-resolved. Kiwima (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tea room convo[edit]

--Barytonesis (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)Reply