Talk:transversary
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kiwima in topic RFV discussion: December 2019
This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process (permalink).
Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.
Rfv-sense: transverse DTLHS (talk) 16:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- As an aside, Century suggests a noun definition which seems like it's broader than ours, and such breadth seems to be supported by google books:"transversaries" quotations referring to staffs and mariner's tools having transversaries, not just doors or masts. - -sche (discuss) 17:08, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- I've modified our noun definition. It's also not obsolete, but perhaps historical. - -sche (discuss) 21:16, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- I found two citations of the RFVed sense: Citations:transversary. (They also suggest that "obsolete" is too strong a word. "Dated" and/or "uncommon", maybe.) - -sche (discuss) 17:14, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- And I added a third. This is cited. Kiwima (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- It seems moderately abundant in medical contexts (mostly skeletal) at Google Scholar, neither dated nor uncommon. DCDuring (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- I'd say this passes, then (although I suppose we should wait a week). - -sche (discuss) 01:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- It seems moderately abundant in medical contexts (mostly skeletal) at Google Scholar, neither dated nor uncommon. DCDuring (talk) 09:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- And I added a third. This is cited. Kiwima (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
RFV-passed Kiwima (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)