User talk:Rakkalrast

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rakkalrast (talk) 15:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Ultimateria (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aramaic vs. Classical Syriac[edit]

Hi. Why did you do this? We treat Classical Syriac as separate from Aramaic. See WT:LANGTREAT. If you think Arabic was borrowed from an Aramaic dialect other than Classical Syriac, then the Syriac script should be changed as well. --Vahag (talk) 19:03, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, yeah I am a bit unsure about the difference between Syriac and Aramaic. I'll change it back. Rakkalrast (talk) 19:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Classical Syriac is one of many Aramaic dialects. It was spoken over certain periods of time in certain geographical areas. Armenian has borrowed many words from it, as Christianity was initially introduced into Armenia from Edessa, the cradle of Classical Syriac. Much earlier Armenian had also borrowed several commerce-related terms from Imperial Aramaic. The distinction is useful.
I do not know if those Arabic words are borrowed specifically from the Classical Syriac dialect. What do your sources say? If they simply say "from Aramaic" without elaborating, we can write here "an Aramaic borrowing; compare Classical Syriac foo". My problem is with using the code arc with the Syriac script. --Vahag (talk) 20:47, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lishana Deni šāta[edit]

You added Lishana Deni שאנא (šāta) to the list of descendants of Proto-Semitic *šan-, but there is not way that šāta can be spelled שאנא. Where did you get this information? Are you sure it isn't spelled שתא or שאתא? --WikiTiki89 15:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


you are correct it should be שאתא, thanks for noticing the mistake. http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Ygzh_tRZ7NMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=neo-aramaic&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QeHLU4_yIrHn7AaSjIGgBw&ved=0CCUQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false page 293 Rakkalrast (talk) 15:39, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]