a-spec: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

External tools: Page statistics • Find when text was added/removed


Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

11 February 2024

26 September 2023

31 August 2023

15 June 2023

2 June 2023

29 May 2023

  • curprev 22:1622:16, 29 May 2023-sche talk contribs 5,775 bytes −441 huh? the term 'a-spec' is clearly taking words that start with 'a' and abbreviating them to the first letter, so this is not a cogent objection, since you *could theoretically* abbreviate 'autism' to 'a' just like 'm-spec' is not from an Ancient Greek prefix μ, but from abbreviated 'multi-' terms. (the issue is that 'could theoretically' doesn't seem to translate into 'has been in fact'.) undo
  • curprev 21:5021:50, 29 May 2023Adam9007 talk contribs 6,216 bytes +607 Added etymology information undo

30 April 2023

19 April 2023

  • curprev 19:5719:57, 19 April 2023-sche talk contribs 5,422 bytes +276 per the cited sources which belabor this point, clarify the lack of evidence, and rejection of the claim by autistic people. (one wonders if this is one of those astroterf-amplified campaigns like have tried to claim certain other words queer people use were bad.) undo

18 April 2023

9 April 2023

  • curprev 04:4904:49, 9 April 2023Raladic talk contribs 4,383 bytes −499 Undo revision 72633488 by -sche (talk) Based on my research, the cited thesis and the mention in it to some tumbler pages (all of which say it was never actually associated with autism) make this a very questionable mention, so per w:en:WP:RS and w:en:WP:VERIFY I feel it is not valid to even mention unless someone can actually find a reliable verifiable source undo Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 02:2702:27, 9 April 2023-sche talk contribs 4,882 bytes +499 probably more informative to include the rebuttal, than to omit the issue entirely, then... what do you think about giving it less prominence (and more rebuttal), like this? undo Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 01:5601:56, 9 April 2023Raladic talk contribsm 4,383 bytes −506 Removing unvalidated claims - even the referenced thesis itself pointed out it is unsubstantiated undo Tag: Reverted

14 March 2023

13 March 2023

5 September 2022

24 March 2022

10 February 2022

29 September 2021

22 February 2021

4 January 2021

8 December 2020

8 November 2020

4 September 2020

7 August 2020

3 June 2020

2 June 2020

26 May 2020

7 May 2020

6 April 2020