Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-08/User:OctraBot for bot status: difference between revisions

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Go to previous editGo to next edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 32: Line 32:


==== Decision ====
==== Decision ====
'''Passed'''. 5-1-0 (100%-0%) --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
* <noinclude>[[Category:Votes that have not been closed|User: for bot status]]</noinclude>
:I unblocked the bot without prejudice.
:{{ping|Stephen G. Brown|SemperBlotto|Chuck Entz}}, someone please flip the bit for {{ping|OctraBot}}.
:{{ping|Octahedron80}}, the bot user page is empty. It would be nice if it had a short description of the bot work. Thank you. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:05, 9 September 2016

User:OctraBot for bot status

  • Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:OctraBot for the following purposes:
    1. Interwiki cleanup using pywikibot. It has been run on many Wiktionaries for some time.
    2. Content cleanup implementing Wiki.java. This task is generic purpose; it will be manually run in required situation such as template replacement, format cleanup. It has ever been run on Thai Wikipedia, Thai Wiktionary and few other projects. Some tasks in this scope may need to vote in the future.
    Octahedron80 (talk) 00:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Vote starts: 00:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 23:59, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I said Octahedron80 could use OctraBot to do a very small test run if the owner wanted. Apparently the test run is going well. Hence support. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:46, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    The bot was blocked a few days ago because the owner did 60+ test edits before the bot was approved. The number of edits may be a little high, but the edits seem otherwise OK with me. In my opinion, the bot can be unblocked without prejudice if this vote passes. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 09:56, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    WT:BOT says to do "10-50" test edits, so 60+ does not sound too excessive. --WikiTiki89 11:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support -Xbony2 (talk) 20:39, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support Wyang (talk) 10:48, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 12:49, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Abstain

  1. Abstain Andrew Sheedy (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decision

Passed. 5-1-0 (100%-0%) --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I unblocked the bot without prejudice.
@Stephen G. Brown, SemperBlotto, Chuck Entz, someone please flip the bit for @OctraBot.
@Octahedron80, the bot user page is empty. It would be nice if it had a short description of the bot work. Thank you. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2016-08/User:OctraBot_for_bot_status&oldid=40013630"