Talk:Worster-Drought
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: November 2020–January 2021
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
I believe there is a policy against double-barrelled surnames, personally I don't see any point in including them. I guess the rest of the entry is OK. DonnanZ (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, we had decided long ago that double-barrelled surnames are nothing but trouble (and, in a way, are no less SOP than a combination of a given name and a surname or middle name and surname). Any combination could be created by happenstance, with no lexicological significance, and the combination means no more than having surname X joined with surname Y. bd2412 T 00:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, SOP. PUC – 12:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete the surname. Equinox ◑ 05:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Things are getting worse and worster.
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 11:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC) - RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)