Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to: navigation, search
Keep tidy.svg

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.

It's not Tatar, references are invalid, not supporting the claim at all. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 01:32, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, obvious garbage, nothing to discuss here. deleted -- Liliana 13:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


Keep tidy.svg

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified may either mean that this information is fabricated, or is merely beyond our resources to confirm. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


{{wrongscript}} was reverted for reasons I don't understand. As such, an RfV will have to do. -- Liliana 22:22, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

The Latin alphabet was used to write Tatar at two different points in history, and the letters h, a and r made it into the alphabet both times, so har’s script seems OK. It may, however, not be citeable, so RFV does seem like the appropriate forum. - -sche (discuss) 19:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
I've set all the other Tatar terms tagged with {{wrongscript}} to point here; all must be citable per WT:CFI. Mglovesfun (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
They should be linked to from here or else people won't find them. -- Liliana 11:36, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Ok, looks like I gotta come to rescue again:
a voce‎
But you're gonna have to put in the links yourself. I certainly won't do that. -- Liliana 21:30, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
I used |fragment=har, so na. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
I've formatted the <pre>-coded section above, which is I think what Liliana meant by "put in the links". - -sche (discuss) 01:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
I can't confirm the existence of "хар" (Cyrillic) or "har" (Roman). Both references are invalid, they are not not about Tatar. Snow in Tatar is кар (qar). --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 01:24, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
süküt, töpe (and deriviatives), tiş and some others are not (Volga) Tatar but Crimean Tatar. Delete [[a voce‎]], curd - bad entry and invalid references. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Moved some of the listed entries, which I was able to confirm to Crimean Tatar, reformatted. If happy with the move, please remove rfv/rfd tags. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 02:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

RFV failed. --Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 06:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

--Anatoli (обсудить/вклад) 06:16, 21 October 2013 (UTC)


There appears to be no authentic Germanic cognate[2] for CURD; but compare Irish CRŪTH[4] and English crowd[3] from Old English crūdan (to press)[8].

[0] means 'Absolutely not; [1] means 'Exceedingly unlikely'; [2] means 'Very dubious'; [3] means 'Questionable'; [4] means 'Possible'; [5] means 'Probable'; [6] means 'Likely'; [7] means 'Most Likely' or *Unattested; [8] means 'Attested'; [9] means 'Obvious' - only used for close matches within the same language or dialect, at linkable periods.

Andrew H. Gray 21:44, 5 October 2015 (UTC) Andrew (talk)