Talk:funner

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Equinox in topic Funner listed as Adjective now
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This entry has survived Wiktionary's verification process.

Please do not re-nominate for verification without comprehensive reasons for doing so.


Nonce/humor only. --Connel MacKenzie T C 19:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

It should be "more fun". SemperBlotto 21:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Considering the above entry (funnest) is accepted, shouldn't funner also be accepted? I can't stand either of them, but shouldn't we try to be consistent? Doremítzwr 00:13, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Not if this one is stupider. Davilla 09:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
To me, they seem equally stupid. In general, if an adjective has a particular superlative form (id est -er), does it not also have a corresponding comparative form (id est -est)? I find myself agreeing with Paul G in the above discussion concerning funnest
Doremítzwr 12:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Because I personally prefer "more stupid" to "stupider" and "stupidest" to "most stupid", it would be pretty easy for me to accept. ∂ανίΠα 23:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Added cites and a usage note with references. —Muke Tever 23:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

rfvpassed. Andrew massyn 17:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply


Funner listed as Adjective now

[edit]

It appears all Citations are broken. And checking both webster and dictionary.com both list funner as an adjective and part of the English language now.

Yes, to me it's a little informal but not really nonstandard. Equinox 17:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)Reply